Cases 11 - 20 of 153
Nessel v. M & M Wines Corp.
as 1:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
M & M Wines Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RYECO, LLC v. M M GROCERY INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03435
Plaintiff:
RYECO, LLC
Defendant:
M M GROCERY INC. doing business as D/B/A APNA BAZAR CASH & CARRY D/B/A APNA BAZAR BENSALEM, NANAK GROCERY, INC. doing business as D/B/A APNA BAZAR CASH & CARRY D/B/A APNA BAZAR FARMERS MARKET D/B/A APNA BAZAR DAYTON, DK GROCERY INCORPORATED doing business as D/B/A APNA BAZAR CASH & CARRY D/B/A APNA BAZAR FARMERS MARKET D/B/A APNA BAZAR EDISON and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Hicks et al v. Milton et al
as 2:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Peter Hicks, Hicks and Wasatch Hicks
Defendant:
Trevor R. Milton, M&M Residual and T&M Residual
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05816
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fatima Torres-Carranza, et al v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2852
Petitioner:
FATIMA CECILIA TORRES-CARRANZA, F. B. Z.-T. and M. M. T-.C.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Veolia North America, LLC, et alIn re: Veolia North America, LLC, et al
as 21-103
Petitioner:
In re: VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA, LLC and VEOLIA NORTH AMERICAN OPERATING SERVICES, LLC
Respondent:
LUKE WAID, Parent and Next-Friend of SR, a minor; et al., MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ, Parent and Next-Friend of SR, a minor, S. R., a minor, by parents and Next-Friends Luke Waid and Michelle Rodriguez and others
In re: A. L., et al v. Ring LLC
as 21-55872
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RING LLC PRIVACY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A. L., J. B., M. M. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RING LLC
Shaw, et al v. Schulte, et al
as 21-3130
Plaintiff:
BLAINE FRANKLIN SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class, SAMUEL JAMES SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class, MARK ERICH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSHUA BOSIRE, individually and on behalf of a class
Defendant / Appellant:
MASTER TROOPER DOUG SCHULTE, in his individual capacity and TECHNICAL TROOPER BRANDON MCMILLAN, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
HERMAN JONES, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Kansas Highway Patrol
Shaw, et al v. Schulte, et al
as 21-3131
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BLAINE FRANKLIN SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class and SAMUEL JAMES SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BOSIRE, individually and on behalf of a class, MARK ERICH and SHAWNA MALONEY, individually and as the mother and natural guardian of minor D. M. minor M. M.
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUG SCHULTE, Master Trooper, in his individual capacity and BRANDON MCMILLAN, Technical Trooper, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
HERMAN JONES, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Kansas Highway Patrol
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
