Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Joshua Silfee v. Automatic Data Processing Inc, et al
as 16-3725
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA SILFEE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC
Defendant - Appellant:
ERG STAFFING SERVICE LLP
Schwartzman et al v. Label, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv05793
Plaintiff:
Brad Schwartzman and Trusgan, Inc.
Defendant:
Label, LLC , Label, NY. LLC , David Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
SILFEE v. AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, INC.
as 3:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Joshua Silfee
Defendant:
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
SILFEE v. AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, INC.
as 2:2014cv04908
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SILFEE
Defendant:
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 260
Carrie Couser v. Automatic Data Processing Inc
as 5:2013cv01894
Defendant:
Automatic Data Processing Inc
Plaintiff:
Carrie Couser
Anderson v. ADP Screening and Selecton Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00512
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
ADP Screening and Selecton Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00996
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Betty Barber, et al v. Paychex Inc., et al
as 10-14334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BETTY BARBER, Realtor on behalf of United States of America and ROXANNE A. JOFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAYCHEX INC., AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC. and CERIDIAN CORPORTION, a Wholly owned subsidiary of Ceridian Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
