Cases 11 - 20 of 49
USA v. Quincy Bloodworth
as 19-1193
Defendant / Appellant:
QUINCY TREMAYNE BLOODWORTH, aka Quincy Tremayne Smith-Bloodworth
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DeKalb County, Georgia v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45503
Plaintiff:
DeKalb County, Georgia
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Purdue Pharma, Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
ApolloMD Business Services, LLC v. Attain Med, Inc. et al
as GAN/1:18-cv-01662
Plaintiff:
ApolloMD Business Services, LLC
Defendant:
Attain Med, Inc. , Bloodworth Wholesale Drugs, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
DeKalb County, Georgia v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv01498
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Actavis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
DeKalb County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
The County of Fulton v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as GAN/1:17-cv-04757
Plaintiff:
The County of Fulton
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, LP , Purdue Pharma, Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
In re the Matter of the Estate of Cloteal Bloodworth et al
as 2:2017cv07735
Petitioner:
LaQuintee D. Bloodworth
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Dr Benjamin Carson
In Re:
The Matter of the Estate of Cloteal Bloodworth
Loretta Little, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 17-80178
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LORETTA LITTLE, BRENDA ANDERSON, STELLA BATTEN and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
PFIZER, INC.
US v. Andrea Bloodworth
as 17-4195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREA BLOODWORTH, a/k/a Andre Thettle Green
Bloodworth v. Chase Auto Finance
as 2:2016cv06407
Plaintiff:
Steven Bloodworth
Defendant:
Chase Auto Finance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
