Cases 11 - 20 of 38
United States v. Brian Reynolds
as 20-2876
Defendant / Appellant:
Brian Edward Reynolds, also known as Brian Reynolds
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Brian Stowe
as 19-50951
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN EDWARD STOWE, also known as Brian Stowe
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brian Reynolds v. J. Petrucci
as 19-2900
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Reynolds
Respondent:
Acting Warden J. Petrucci
Moody v. Nike Corporation
as 3:2019cv01242
Defendant:
Nike Corporation
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
TEXAS DEFENDER SERVICE et al v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00426
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
TEXAS DEFENDER SERVICE , JOHN ALLEN RUBIO , GABRIEL PAUL HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Nuss et al
as 3:2016cv02202
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Brian Edward Nuss, Lori Brussock Nuss and Vinoce Vineyards, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Nuss et al
as 4:2016cv02202
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Nuss, Brian Edward Nuss doing business as Twenty Rows and Vinoce Tasting Room also known as Vinoce Vineyards, Lori Brussock Nuss doing business as Twenty Rows and Vinoce Tasting Room also known as Vinoce Vineyards and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Communications Act of 1994
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
