Cases 11 - 20 of 2,161
United States of America v. Castillo
as 24-3407
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ASHLEY CASTILLO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WATTS v. MUSUNURI et al
as 2:2024cv02234
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WATTS
Defendant:
SHANKAR MUSUNURI, SANJAY SUBRAMANIAN, JESSICA CRESPO and others
Mario Abernathy v.Glenda Marti et al
as 5:2024cv01042
Defendant:
Wendy Y. Medina, Leon Carlo Sayo, Lisa Sayo and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CASTILLO v. USA
as 1:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
EFRAIN MARTINEZ CASTILLO
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Rondon-Castillo v. Garland
as 24-1395
Petitioner:
LUIS JOSE RONDON-CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorrney General
Shallowhorn v. Lopez, et al.
as 24-2484
Plaintiff:
ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN
Defendant:
R. LOPEZ, Correctional Officer, Y. CASTILLO, Correctional officer, H. MOSELEY, Correctional Officer and others
Segura, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al.
as 24-2445
Plaintiff:
MARIA SEGURA, individually and as Successor in Interest to Nicholas Segura, deceased, MANUEL SEGURA, individually and as Successor in Interest to Nicholas Segura, deceased and VICTOR SEGURA, individually
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CARLOS CASTILLO and JONATHAN KEIL
Castillo-Pizarro v. Garland
as 24-933
Petitioner:
BLANCA REBECA CASTILLO-PIZARRO, ALISON DANIELA ALVAREZ-CASTILLO and EVELYN JAZMIN ALVAREZ-CASTILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
