Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 304
In re: Mark Chappelle
as 23-12614
Petitioner: In re: MARK AUGUSTUS CHAPPELLE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Julie Barfuss v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 23-80068
Petitioner: JULIE BARFUSS, RANDY FLOYD BARFUS, RUMER HENRY` and others
Respondent: LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and TICKETMASTER L.L.C.
Deaton et al v. Stephens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff: D Deaton, T Peake, J. K. D. and others
Defendant: Patricia Stephens, Agnes Chappell, Alisha Ruffin May and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rivera et al v. Washington State Building Code Council We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03070
Plaintiff: Jamon Rivera, Inland NW AGC, Spokane Home Builders Association and others
Defendant: Washington State Building Code Council, Climate Solutions, The Lands Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ev Fed. Question: Environment
In re: Robert Chappell
as 23-10668
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT JACOB CHAPPELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Chappell
as 23-30100
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Brian W. Chappell
YANG v. DURRANT et al
as 2:2023cv00235
Plaintiff: IN CHUL YANG
Defendant: CAMERON DURRANT, TIMOTHY MORRIS, RAINER BOEHM and others
USA v. Scott Chappelle
as 22-1969
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: SCOTT A. CHAPPELLE
GREENBAUM v. HUMANIGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06118
Plaintiff: SCOTT GREENBAUM
Defendant: HUMANIGEN, INC., TIMOTHY MORRIS, CAMERON DURRANT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
GREENBAUM v. HUMANIGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06117
Plaintiff: SCOTT GREENBAUM
Defendant: HUMANIGEN, INC., CAMERON DURRANT, TIMOTHY MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?