Cases 11 - 20 of 10,284
National Center for Public Policy Research v. SEC
as 24-2173
Petitioner:
National Center for Public Policy Research
Respondent:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Mintz et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 1:2024cv06854
Plaintiff:
Hal Mintz and SABBY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
U.S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gogliormella et al
as 1:2024cv04348
Defendant:
Karim Ibrahim, Mario Gogliormella, Steven Lacaj and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
American Securities Association v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 8:2024cv01377
Plaintiff:
American Securities Association
Defendant:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wong
as 1:2024cv04231
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Andre Wong
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. NI et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Defendant:
Jian Ming Ni, Zhou Min Ni and Jonathan Ni
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Murray et al
as 1:2024cv11432
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert Scott Murray, Trillium Capital LLC and The R. Scott Murray Remainder Trust - 2000
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mercado et al
as 3:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Frank Lynold Mercado and Tiger Wolf Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Ruiz v. The Bradford Exchange, Ltd.
as 24-3378
Plaintiff:
JOSE RUIZ
Defendant:
THE BRADFORD EXCHANGE, LTD.
Ruiz v. The Bradford Exchange, Ltd.
as 24-3372
Respondent:
JOSE RUIZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
THE BRADFORD EXCHANGE, LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
