Cases 11 - 20 of 1,887
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NAVISTAR, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NAVISTAR, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and ARCONIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 Comprehensive Environmental Compen/Resp/Liab (CERCLA) (Definitions)
Gallegos v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Miguel Gallegos
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Howard et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Nathan Howard and Marija Howard
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC v. Ford Motor Company
as 24-1381
Appellant:
ETHANOL BOOSTING SYSTEMS, LLC and MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC v. Ford Motor Company
as 24-1383
Appellant:
ETHANOL BOOSTING SYSTEMS, LLC and MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC v. Ford Motor Company
as 24-1382
Appellant:
ETHANOL BOOSTING SYSTEMS, LLC and MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Scriber, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 23-3966
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL SCRIBER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STACY POWELL, DOUG HARRIGAN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Bendana Mendieta, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 23-3715
Petitioner / Appellant:
VANESSA BENDANA MENDIETA and CARLOS PARDO
Respondent / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Fontenot v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Devin Michael Fontenot
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Menard et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2023cv01526
Plaintiff:
Duston Daniel Menard and Amber Rourk Menard
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
