Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe 1
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Amer Spirit and Cheer Essentials, Inc., et al v. Varsity Brands, LLC, et al
as 23-5364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN SPIRIT AND CHEER ESSENTIALS, INC., by Heidi Weber, ROCKSTAR CHAMPIONSHIPS, LLC, by David Owens, JEFF & CRAIG CHEER, LLC, by Craig Hallmark, dba Jeff And Craig Camps and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VARSITY BRANDS, LLC, BSN SPORTS, LLC, VARSITY SPIRIT, LLC and others
American Spirit and Cheer Essentials, Inc. et al v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02782
Defendant:
USA Federation for Sport Cheering doing business as USA Cheer, Charlesbank Capital Partners, LLC, Herff Jones, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff & Craig Cheer, LLC doing business as Jeff and Craig Camps, Ashley Haygood, American Spirit and Cheer Essentials, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Fusion Elite All Stars et al v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02600
Plaintiff:
Fusion Elite All Stars, Stars and Stripes Gymnastics Academy, Inc. d/b/a Stars and Stripes Kids Activity Center, Spirit Factor LLC d/b/a Fuel Athletics and others
Defendant:
Varsity Spirit Fashions & Supplies, Inc., U.S. All Star Federation, Inc., Varsity Brands, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Kathryn Anne Radek, Janine Cherasaro and Lauren Hayes
Not Classified By Court:
Rebel Athletic Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Nicholls et al v. Greaves et al
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
David Nicholls, Adaptive Bobsled and Sports Association Inc, Denis Kozev and others
Defendant:
David Greaves, Larry Sidney, Adam Jeremy Edelman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
HEXAGON US FEDERAL, INC. v. USA
as 1:2022cv01778
Plaintiff:
HEXAGON US FEDERAL, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc.
as 22-128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hao Zhe Wang
Defendant / Appellee:
Verizon Communications Inc., Verizon Business Network Services Inc., One Verizon Way Basking Ridge NJ 07920, Verizon Connected Solutions Inc. and others
Defendant:
Verizon New England Inc., Verizon Digital Media Services Inc. and Cellco Partnership
State of Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-13104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT M. SPEER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Army, DOUGLAS LAMONT, in his official capacity as senior exercising the functions of the Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Army for Civil Works and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Intervenor / Appellee:
ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION, CITY OF ATLANTA, CITY OF GAINESVILLE, GEORGIA and others
Relevent Sports, LLC v. United States Soccer Federatio
as 21-2088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Relevent Sports, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Soccer Federation, Inc. and Federation Internationale de Football Association
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, William W. Berry, III, Montague Professor of Law at the University of Mississippi School of Law., Aaron Edlin, Richard W. Jennings Professor of Law and Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley. and others
National Wildlife Federation, Inc., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-13444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APALACHICOLA BAY AND RIVER KEEPER, INC., NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY, US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION, CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
