Cases 11 - 20 of 468
Rigney et al v. Cyberpoint3 Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01420
Plaintiff:
John Rigney and Evan Dornbush
Defendant:
Cyberpoint3 Holdings, LLC, Cyber Capital Partners, LLC, Point3 Security, Inc. and others
Bailey et al v. Zendesk, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Brian Bailey and Scott Franklin
Defendant:
Zendesk, Inc., Mikkel Svane, Archana Agrawal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
MCKAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00337
Petitioner:
GAYLE MCKAY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
DUNCAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00331
Petitioner:
GAYLE DUNCAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Finger v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
Hamilton v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01578
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hamilton
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
Shumacher v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
Leo Shumacher
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
Torrey v. Infectious Diseases Socty
as 22-40728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Torrey, Kathryn Kocurek, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of J. David Kocurek, Ph.D., Amy Hanneken and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Infectious Diseases Society of America
Lin v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09002
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lin
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
O'Dell v. Brigham Minerals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08707
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Brigham Minerals, Inc., Ben M. Brigham, Robert M. Roosa and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
