Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Daniel Rathbun v. Indymac Mortgage Services, et al
as 13-35065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL W. RATHBUN
Defendant - Appellee:
INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES, ONE WEST BANK, FSB and JOHN DOES, 1-25
Travis Middleton, et al v. Indymac Mortgage Svc., et al
as 12-57324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS MIDDLETON and GILDA EVANS
Defendant:
INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES/ONEWEST BANK FSB
Defendant - Appellee:
ONEWEST BANK, FSB, CHRIS CANADA, LAURA REGINEK and others
Mellen et al v. Indymac Mortgage Services, FSB
as 7:2012cv06434
Plaintiff:
Ronald B. Mellen and Jayne Mircica
Defendant:
Indymac Mortgage Services, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beekman v. IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB et al
as 9:2012cv80887
Plaintiff:
James G Beekman
Defendant:
IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB, Indymac Mortgage Services, OneWest Bank, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Travis Middleton et al v. Indymac Mortgage Services OneWest Bank FSB et al
as 2:2012cv06457
Defendant:
Alisha Bender, Dianne Burnett, Chris Canada and others
Plaintiff:
Gilda Evans and Travis Middleton
Rodriguez v. Indymac Mortgage Services, FSB
as 8:2012cv02207
Plaintiff:
Yeidy Rodriguez
Defendant:
Indymac Mortgage Services, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rathburn v. Indymac Mortgage Services et al
as 9:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Rathbun
Defendant:
Indymac Mortgage Services, One West Bank, FSB and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pena v. IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Defendant:
IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., Indymac Mortgage Services and OneWest Bank, FSB
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01877
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
