Cases 11 - 20 of 186
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00772
Plaintiff:
Patterson, Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
US v. James Lisenby
as 22-6656
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT LISENBY, a/k/a James Robert Ratliff
USA v. James Black
as 22-1254
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT BLACK, aka Jim Gribble, aka Victor Valentine
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Owens et al v. Taliban
as 1:2022cv01949
Defendant:
Taliban and Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
Plaintiff:
James Owens, Estate of Betty Owens Evely, Gary Robert Owens and others
Not Classified By Court:
Christine O'Neil
Interested Party:
Anne Wodenshek, Sarah Wodenshek, Haley Wodenshek and others
Garnishee:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Velissaris
as 1:2022cv01347
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
James Robert Velissaris
Intervenor:
United States Attorney
James Nobles, Jr.In re: James Nobles, Jr.
as 22-60088
Petitioner:
In re: James W. Nobles, Jr. and Angelo Dorizas
Respondent:
Gregory Cole, William M. Cole, Robert Cole and others
Wayne FerrellIn re: Wayne Ferrell
as 22-60083
Petitioner:
In re: Wayne E. Ferrell, Jr.
Respondent:
Gregory Cole, William M. Cole, Robert Cole and others
United States v. Bailey
as 21-5085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT BAILEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
