Cases 11 - 20 of 70
McKeown v. Wray
as 23-7877
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN P. MCKEOWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, JOE BIDEN, DAVID HILL and others
FONTANEZ v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv03540
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO FONTANEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN and JANET YELLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nobile v. Biden
as 23-7543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATACHA NOBILE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, Administration and Vice President HARRIS
Zelesnik v. President Joe Biden et al
as 2:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Social Security Administration, General Electric Company and others
Jordan v. White House Administration
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Terrell Darron Jordan and Tracy D. Halsell, r
Defendant:
White House Administration and President Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
David Thistle v. USDC-CASD
as 23-70074
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID JOHN THISTLE, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
DAVID JOHN THISTLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Bazan v. Biden
as 7:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Bazan
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Udo-Akang v. Biden
as 1:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Dr. Daniel Udo-Akang
Defendant:
President Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
MODUGU v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Nikhil Kumar Modugu
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY BLINKEN, DONALD HEFLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
MOVVA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Sathvik Movva and ORIGIN HUBS, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, JENNIFER LARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
