Cases 11 - 20 of 152
Bay Point Capital Partners II, LP v. Hoplite, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00375
Plaintiff:
Bay Point Capital Partners II, LP
Defendant:
Hoplite Entertainment, Inc., Jonathan Lee Smith and Hoplite, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Columbia State Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Jonathan Oliver
as 20-30116
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE OLIVER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jonathan Page v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 20-11807
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE PAGE
JACKSON v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF NAVY
as 1:2020cv00938
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE JACKSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Jonathan Richardson v. University of Texas Systems, et al
as 19-50811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS and GERALD LEWIS, Individually and is his offical capacity as a University of Texas at San Antonio Police Officer
Evanston Insurance Company v. Aminokit Laboratories, et al
as 19-1071
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE
Defendant:
AMINOKIT LABORATORIES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Evanston Insurance Company v. Aminokit Laboratories, et al
as 19-1065
Defendant:
JONATHAN LEE
Defendant / Appellant:
AMINOKIT LABORATORIES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Lee v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
as 4:2018cv01355
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee
Defendant:
ORG GC GP Buyer, LLC and GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Jonathan Read
as 17-10439
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE READ
USA v. Jonathan Eubanks
as 17-13108
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE EUBANKS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
