Cases 11 - 20 of 324
Kline v. National Gas & Electric, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC, Todd Gibson, Keith Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kline v. MasTec North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
MasTec North America, Inc. and Jose R. Mas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Clean Juice Franchising, LLC v. Charleston Juicing, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Clean Juice Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Charleston Juicing, LLC, Charleston Juicing Calhoun, LLC, Charleston Juicing West Ashley, LLC and others
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Roberts v. Bloom Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv02935
Plaintiff:
Elissa M. Roberts, James Everett Hunt, Juan Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Scott Sandell, Mary A. Ayotte, Eddy Zervigon and others
Petitioner:
Cecil W. Forsberg and Ronald M. Kruse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Kline v. Primis Bank
as 3:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Robert Kline
Defendant:
Primis Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Moore v. Amedisys, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Moore
Defendant:
Amedisys, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Paul Kusserow and others
Weiss v. Amedisys, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07253
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Amedisys, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Paul Kusserow and others
F.M. Byrd Family Trust v. Amedisys, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07631
Plaintiff:
F.M. Byrd Family Trust
Defendant:
Amedisys, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Vickie L. Capps and others
Murray v. Amedisys, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07258
Plaintiff:
Brian Murray
Defendant:
Amedisys, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Paul B. Kusserow and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
