Cases 11 - 20 of 6,120
Reid v. The City of New York
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC REID
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, MARTHA W. KING, In their official and individual capacity, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR., In their official and individual capacity and others
Marquez v. Silver
as 24-1555
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS MARQUEZ
Defendant:
LAUREN DESOLE, individually, GEORGE SILVER, individually, LAWRENCE MARKS, individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hall v. Rosenberg, et al.
as 24-3580
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge ALICIA G. ROSENBERG, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE, Attorney CAREE HARPER, ATTORNEY, Civil Rights Attorney and others
Barrett v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-3504
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY LEE BARRETT
Defendant:
SHERRY JOHNSON, ARNP, LISA RAPP, ARNP, T. IRION, Lt. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Defendant:
James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clark v. City Impound Lot et al
as 4:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Clark
Defendant:
City Impound Lot, Mr. Jim Schwartztrauber, Ms. Sara Schwartztrauber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ragsdale et al v. Leadpoint, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04542
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ragsdale, Carl Yockman and Savannah Berger
Defendant:
Leadpoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
WEST-THOMAS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00827
Petitioner:
LISA WEST-THOMAS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
