Cases 11 - 20 of 25
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S,
as 2:2012mc00145
Plaintiff:
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S,
Defendant:
T.J.D. INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Maersk Inc. v. Scrap Metal Recycling, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc21780
Plaintiff:
Maersk Inc.
Defendant:
Scrap Metal Recycling, Inc. and The Laminate Factory of North America, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Maersk Inc v. Radiance Group, LLC
as 2:2010mc00094
Plaintiff:
Maersk Inc
Defendant:
Radiance Group, LLC
Maersk Inc. v. Radiance Group, LLC
as 2:2010mc00100
Plaintiff:
Maersk Inc.
Defendant:
Radiance Group, LLC
Maersk, Inc. v. Trade Pro et al
as 3:2010mc00282
Plaintiff:
Maersk, Inc.
Defendant:
Trade Pro and Serge Swajder
Maersk Inc. v. Global Express Shipping and Delivery Company, Inc.
as 1:2009cv03381
Plaintiff:
Maersk Inc.
Defendant:
Global Express Shipping and Delivery Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 1701 Violation of Shipping Act of 1984
Type:
Other Statutes
Maersk Inc. v. Product Marketing Concepts, Inc.
as 2:2009mc00024
Plaintiff:
Maersk Inc.
Defendant:
Product Marketing Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Maersk Inc v. Gold Coast Shipping LLC
as 3:2009mc00254
Plaintiff:
Maersk Inc
Defendant:
Gold Coast Shipping LLC
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
The United States of America, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 09-56040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel., AKA Seal 3 and STANLEY D. MOSLER, AKA Seal 2
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, AKA Seal A, CITY OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR DEPARTMENT, AKA Seal B, PORT OF LOS ANGELES, AKA Seal C and others
Maersk, Inc. v. Intellicapital LLC
as 1:2009mc21445
Plaintiff:
Maersk, Inc.
Defendant:
Intellicapital LLC
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
