Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Poulos v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv01923
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Poulos
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc. , John T. Chambers , Randy Pond and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
POWELL V HOME DEPOT
as 11-1060
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Michael S. Powell
Defendant-Appellant:
The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
POWELL V HOME DEPOT
as 10-1416
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
Michael S. Powell, Michael S. Powell, Michael S. Powell and others
POWELL V HOME DEPOT
as 10-1409
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
Michael S. Powell, Michael S. Powell, Michael S. Powell and others
Michael S. Powell:
, , and others
Defendant-Appellant:
The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and others
Michael Angelo Powell v. R Grounds Warden
as 8:2010cv00111
Respondent:
R. Grounds
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Powell
John Doe and Jane Doe 1 through 20 et al v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2009cv00456
Defendant:
Millard Gustafson, State of Nebraska, Nebraska State Patrol and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe 1 through 20, John Doe and Jane Doe A through K and John Doe and Jane Doe 1 through 36
Interested Party:
Senator Pete Pirsch, Dave Cookson, John Freudenberg and others
Intervenor:
John Doe 21-23
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Powell
as 09-4427
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. POWELL
Michael E. Powell v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-76623
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Powell
Powell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv61862
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Powell and Michael S. Powell
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IN RE MASSEY
as 03-1128
Appellee:
JAMES E. ROGAN, Director, Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant:
LEOPOLDO DELLA CIANA, MICHAEL J. POWELL, MOHINDAR S. POONIAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
