Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Scott Camirand v. Brad Cain, et al
as 20-35307
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HILL, Individually and in his official capacity as a Correctional Lieutenant at the Snake River Correctional Institution, BRAD CAIN, Individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Snake River Correctional Institution and JOHN DOES, 1-10; Individually and in their official capacities as employees of the Oregon Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT LEANDER CAMIRAND
US v. James Hill
as 19-4745
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL HILL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Hill
as 19-2783
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL HILL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Hill
as 19-2540
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL HILL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Hill v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 19-30413
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL HILL
Sines et al v. Kessler et al
as 3:2018mc80080
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sines , Seth Wispelwey , Marissa Blair and others
Defendant:
Jason Kessler, Richard Spencer, Christopher Cantwell and others
Sines et al v. Kessler et al
as 2:2018mc04044
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sines , Seth Wispelwey , Marissa Blair and others
Defendant:
Jason Kessler, Richard Spencer, Christopher Cantwell and others
Movant:
David Duke
Jennings et al v. 3M Company et al
as MOE/4:17-cv-00012
Plaintiff:
Hollis Jennings , Thomas Wick , Dennis Patterson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
United States of America v. Hill et al
as 2:2016mc00185
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rusty Michael Hill
Garnishee:
ILWU-PMA Benefit Plans
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States of America v. Hill et al
as 2:2016mc00184
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rusty Michael Hill
Garnishee:
Pacific Maritime Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
