Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Michael Henley v. United States
as 19-2084
Appellant:
Michael Keith Henley
Appellee:
United States of America
Michael Henley v. United States
as 19-1704
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Keith Henley
FCA US LLC, et al v. Brian Flynn, et al
as 18-8015
Petitioner:
FCA US LLC and HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
BRIAN FLYNN, GEORGE BROWN, KELLY BROWN and others
FCA US LLC, et al v. Brian Flynn, et al
as 18-8010
Petitioner:
FCA US LLC and HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
BRIAN FLYNN, GEORGE BROWN, KELLY BROWN and others
Gray et al v. Coleman et al
as 2:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Randle Foran, Roger Wilkison, Stanley Bartlett and others
Defendant:
Turner Commodities Inc, Steven Michael Keith, Jr, Neauman Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flynn et al v. FCA U.S., LLC et al
as 5:2017mc80051
Plaintiff:
Brian Flynn , George Brown , Kelly Brown and others
Defendant:
FCA U.S., LLC and Harman International Industries, Inc
Miscellaneou:
Cisco Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Flynn et al v. FCA U.S., LLC et al
as 3:2016mc00078
Plaintiff:
Brian Flynn , Kelly Brown , George Brown and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Harman International Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flynn et al v. FCA U.S., LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01213
Plaintiff:
Brian Flynn , Kelly Brown , George Brown and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Harman International Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLYNN et al v. FCA U.S., LLC et al
as 1:2016mc02034
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FLYNN , KELLY BROWN , GEORGE BROWN and others
Defendant:
FCA U.S., LLC and HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
