Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. US Department of Health
as 10-2204
Amicus Curiae:
EASTERN BANK, NATIONAL GRID USA, NATIONAL LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES (DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS), KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, THOMAS E. PRICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Intervenor:
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE INC v BROWNING, et al
as 1:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
National Organization for Marriage, Inc.
Defendant:
DAWN K ROBERTS, JORGE L CRUZ-BUSTILLO, WILLIAM H HOLLIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
National Organization for Marriage, Inc v. Daluz et al
as 1:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
National Organization for Marriage, Inc
Defendant:
John Daluz, Frank Rego, Richard Dubois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Organization for Marriage, Inc. v. Walsh et al
as 1:2010cv00751
Plaintiff:
National Organization for Marriage, Inc.
Defendant:
James Walsh, Douglas Kellner, Evelyn Aquila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: National Organization, et al
as 10-1350
Petitioner:
In re: AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION and NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE
Respondent:
NEAL T. ADAMS, R. CHRISTOPHER ALMY, STEPHANIE ANDERSON and others
Interested Party:
ME CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ELECTIONS
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al
as 2:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, National Organization for Marriage California - Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, John Doe #1 and others
Defendant:
Debra Bowen, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Dean C. Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
