Cases 11 - 20 of 328
RAND v. USA
as 1:2023cv01919
Plaintiff:
ANDREA RAND
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Zelesnik v. Judge Hopkins et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Judge Hopkins, PNC Bank, Jane Menke and others
Frydman v. Verschleiser
as 23-938
Plaintiff:
Jacob Frydman
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United Realty Advisors, LP and Prime United Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Multi Capital Group of Companies, L.L.C., Eric Fischgrund, Raul Del Forno and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Eli Verschleiser
James Rand v. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
as 23-2128
Petitioner:
JAMES HARRY RAND
Respondent:
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER
Hamoodi v. Jaddou
as 4:2023cv01713
Plaintiff:
EKHLAS HAMOODI, members Class, Safa Tahrr Al Saegh and others
Defendant:
Director of USCIS UR MENDOZA JADDOU and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rand v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 0:2023cv60789
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Rand
Defendant:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Executive Office of US Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
RAND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. RAND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEYS, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
James Rand v. Rebecca Pallmeyer
as 23-1377
Petitioner:
JAMES HARRY RAND
Respondent:
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER
Frydman v. Verschleiser
as 23-11
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jacob Frydman, United Realty Advisors, LP and Prime United Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Multi Capital Group of Companies, L.L.C., Eric Fischgrund, Raul Del Forno and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Eli Verschleiser
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
