Cases 11 - 20 of 457
Midwest Petroleum Company et al v. St Louis County
as 4:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Midwest Petroleum Company, Wallis Companies, Inc., Spirit Energy, LLC, and others
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Nikki Mazzocchio, et al v. Cotter Corporation, et al
as 23-8008
Respondent:
Nikki Steiner Mazzocchio and Angela Steiner Kraus
Petitioner:
Cotter Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company and St. Louis Airport Authority, A Department of the City of St. Louis
Not Classified By Court:
DJR Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Futura Coatings, Inc.
Empl Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 23-3512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Appellant:
TODD AUGENBAUM
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES E. JONES, MICHAEL J. ANDERSON, STEVEN J. DEMETRIOU and others
City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc., et al
as 22-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF EAST ST. LOUIS, ILLINOIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., DISNEY PLATFORM DISTRIBUTION, INC., APPLE INC. and others
Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2017cv05211
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, Former Federal Immigration and Homeland Security Officials and others
Plaintiff:
Regents of University of California, Janet Napolitano and UC Regents
Petitioner:
City of Seattle, U.S. Conference of Mayors, City of West Hollywood and others
Amicus Curiae:
Services, Immigrant Rights, and Education Network, West Contra Costa Unified School District, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Concepcion, et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al
as 23-1558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL CONCEPCION, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, ALDEMAR BURGOS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and SIDNEY DUPREY CONDE, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, d/b/a MLB, ROBERT D. MANFRED, JR., ALLAN HUBER SELIG and others
Batalla Vidal, et al. v. Nielsen, et al.
as 1:2016cv04756
Defendant:
Baran, Kathy A. Baran, Kelvin Medlock and others
Plaintiff:
Batalla Vidal, Eliana Fernandez, Carolina Fung Feng and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Casey's Distributing, Inc. v. The Office of the Commissioner of Baseball et al
as 1:2022cv04832
Plaintiff:
Casey's Distributing, Inc.
Defendant:
The Officer of the Commissioner, doing business as Major League Baseball, Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., Kansas City Royals Baseball Club LLC d/b/a Kansas City Royals and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Hawkins v. SSM Health Care Corp. et al
as 4:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Tara Hawkins
Defendant:
SSM Health Care Corp. doing business as SSM Health, SSM-SLUH, Inc. doing business as SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital and SSM Health Care St. Louis doing business as SSM Health St. Mary's Hospital-St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
The Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis v. Conterno et al
as 1:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
The Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis
Defendant:
Enrique Conterno, James A. Schoeneck, K. Peony Yu and others
Nominal Defendant:
FibroGen, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
