Cases 11 - 20 of 235
REVOLVING DOOR PROJECT v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
as 1:2022cv03620
Plaintiff:
THE REVOLVING DOOR PROJECT and REVOLVING DOOR PROJECT
Defendant:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv06851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022mc80297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bleuer, et al v. Nigrelli, et al
as 3:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
Rev. Justin Bleuer, Berean Bible Church, New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms and others
Defendant:
Kevin P. Bruen, Michael Korchak, Lori Pettit Riemann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campbell v. Northfield Holding Corp.
as 1:2022cv22834
Defendant:
Kyle Campbell and Northfield Holding Corp. doing business as Florida Window and Door
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Overhead Door Corporation v. ITC
as 22-1656
Appellant:
OVERHEAD DOOR CORPORATION and GMI HOLDINGS, INC.
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Kemp v. Door Dash
as 6:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Bobby M. Kemp
Defendant:
Door Dash
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
West Shore Home, LLC v. Graeser et al
as 1:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
West Shore Home, LLC and West Shore Window & Door, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Brett Graeser and P.J. Fitzpatrick, LLC
D. H. Pace Company, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01005
Plaintiff:
D. H. Pace Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Johnson and Liberty Garage Door Services, LLC
Overhead Door Corporation v. Prida et al
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Overhead Door Corporation
Defendant:
Jarrad Prida and TSC, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
