Cases 11 - 20 of 251
Bongiorno v. United States Government
as 22-2900
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rudy Bongiorno
Respondent / Appellee:
United States Government
ZIMMERMAN v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 2:2022cv04537
Plaintiff:
E. EDWARD ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
ZIMMERMANN v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 2:2022cv03512
Plaintiff:
E EDWARD ZIMMERMANN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Edelman v. United States Government
as 22-1828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Edelman
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Government, Navient Solutions, LLC, Stradley Ronnon Stevens and Young and others
USA v. Paul Bridgewater
as 22-11727
Interested Party:
PAUL BRIDGEWATER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Falastin Martin v. U.S. Government
as 22-1404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FALASTIN MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Multiple U.S. Government federal agencies
Rivera v. The United States Government et al
as 1:2022cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Rivera
Defendant:
The United States Government, Biden Administration, U.S. President Joseph R. Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MEDINA v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
OMAR ALEJANDRO MEDINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ZIMMERMANN v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 2:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
E. EDWARD ZIMMERMAN and E. EDWARD ZIMMERMANN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Webb v. Brunner et al
as 4:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Stewart A. Webb
Defendant:
Tina Lynne Brunner, Blue Springs Municipal Court, Blue Springs Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
