Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hickenlooper v. Kerr, et al
as 12-710
Petitioner:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor of Colorado, in his official capacity
Respondent:
ANDY KERR, Colorado State Representative, NORMA V. ANDERSON, JANE M. BARNES, member Jefferson County Board of Education and others
Blumenkron et al v. Springville Investors, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
David Blumenkron, Katherine Blumenkron and Springville Investors, LLC
Defendant:
David Bragdon, Rex Burkholder, Carlotta Collette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kerr et al v. Hickenlooper
as 1:2011cv01350
Plaintiff:
Andy Kerr , Norma V. Anderson , Jane M. Barnes and others
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv04252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Larry G. Burkholder et al v. Randolph Alan Barmache et al
as 2:2009cv07299
Plaintiff:
Larry G. Burkholder, Larry G. Burkholder, Ehrenreich, Barmache & Burkholder, LLP and others
Defendant:
Randolph Alan Barmache, Terrill Gylles Alford and Barmache & Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States Of America v. Burkholder
as 1:2009mc00293
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
David Burkholder
USA v. Dennis Burkholder
as 08-50446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS BURKHOLDER
BURKHOLDER v. VESSEL/DEBTOR/ENS LEGIS
as 1:2008cv00197
Plaintiff:
GARY MATTHEW BURKHOLDER
Defendant:
VESSEL/DEBTOR/ENS LEGIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
