Cases 21 - 30 of 665
Barber v. NRG Xperts NV LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
Lee Barber
Defendant:
NRG Xperts NV LLC, Jeffrey B Iverson, Breann McCulloch and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
BARBER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00674
Petitioner:
SHAREE BARBER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES and SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BARBER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00657
Petitioner:
SHAREE BARBER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES and SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
USA v. Calvin Barber
as 23-5360
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CALVIN BARBER
Dacres v. McGowan
as 3:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Andre Dacres
Respondent:
Lakae T. McGowan
Interested Party:
Elaine Barber
BARBER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00546
Petitioner:
MARVIN R. BARBER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc. et al v. SnapNurse, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc.
Defendant:
SnapNurse, Inc., Jamie Barber and Jerome Charles
Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc. et al v. SnapNurse, Inc. et al
as 1:2023mi00019
Plaintiff:
Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc.
Defendant:
SnapNurse, Inc., Jamie Barber and Jerome Charles
Dela Cruz v. Reid-Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dela Cruz
Defendant:
James Reid-Anderson, W. Marshall Barber, Richard W Roedel and others
United States of America v. Blondet (Marcquez-Alejandro)
as 23-6133
Defendant:
LUIS BLONDET, OSCAR VALDEZ-GARCIA, JASON DONES-GONZALEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIO MARQUEZ-ALEJANDRO and Chino Montero
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
