Cases 21 - 30 of 33
GOMES et al v. MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv04979
Plaintiff:
MANUEL GOMES and PEDRO GOMES
Defendant:
MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLC , PRESTIGE MOTORS, INC. , JOHN DOE BUSINESSES AND INDIVIDUALS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
MORTIMER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as PAE/2:13-cv-04169
Plaintiff:
LEROY J. MORTIMER and CHERYL MORTIMER
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, AMTICO and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE PARTS CO. , NAPA , QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS and others
Cross_defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, AMTICO and others
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Cargill Inc et al v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC
as 3:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Cargill Inc , Flowserve Corporation , Kelsey Hayes Company and others
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY et al
as 1:2012cv00428
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, ALCOA, INC., EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv07149
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, GLENN SPRINGS HOLDINGS, INC. and BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. A and G German Cars et al
as 2:2011cv07051
Defendant:
A O Smith Corp, A and G German Cars, A and H Plating Inc and others
Plaintiff:
California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Toxic Substances Control and California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Tank/Cleaning:
Chemical Transportation
Gammaloy Ltd:
Facet Energy
GPX INTERNATIONAL TIRE V. UNITED STATES
as 11-1107
Amicus Curiae:
Alabama Metal Industries Corporation, American Spring Wire Corp., ArcelorMittal USA, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Allied Industrial & Service Workers Intl. Union, AFL-CIO-CLC, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
GPX International Tire Corporation, Hebei Starbright Tire Co., Ltd., Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd. and others
Jeffrey Marcus v. BMW of North America, et al
as 10-8077
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JEFFREY MARCUS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated.
Defendant - Respondent:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA
Defendant - Petitioner:
BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC, FKA Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, LLC and BRIDGESTONE CORP
Jeffrey Marcus v. BMW of North America, et al
as 10-8078
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JEFFREY MARCUS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated.
Defendant - Petitioner:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA
Defendant - Respondent:
BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC, FKA Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, LLC and BRIDGESTONE CORP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
