Cases 21 - 30 of 2,265
Fannie Wright v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-10563
Petitioner:
FANNIE WRIGHT
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Kelley v. CIR
as 24-60082
Petitioner:
Stephen R. Kelley and Isabelle Kelley
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Johnson v. CIR
as 24-60077
Petitioner:
Paul Edwin Johnson
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Solid Ground Transportation, Inc., et al v. CIR
as 24-1184
Petitioner / Appellant:
SOLID GROUND TRANSPORTATION, INC. and SOLID GROUND TRANSPORTATION, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP AND PROFIT-SHARING PLAN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Claude Sanders v. CIR
as 24-1053
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLAUDE FRANKLIN SANDERS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Dale Newton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-10166
Petitioner / Appellant:
DALE C. NEWTON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Maureen Robinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-1070
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAUREEN ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Davison, et al v. CIR
as 24-9000
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLEN R. DAVISON and SHARON L. DAVISON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Humbolt Investments, LLC v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-1037
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUMBOLT INVESTMENTS, LLC
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
