Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Creighton et al v. Audi of San Diego et al
as 3:2016cv01058
Plaintiff: Matthew Creighton , Margaret Cohan , Jerry Abshier and others
Defendant: Audi of San Diego , Bob Baker Volkswagen , Carmax Auto Superstore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sutton v. CitiMortgage, Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01778
Defendant: CitiMortgage, Inc
Plaintiff: Chantal Sutton
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Chantale Maffo v. Loretta Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1153
Petitioner: CHANTALE TETA MAFFO
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00001
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United Services Automobile Ass, et al v. Chantal Bastian, et al
as 15-90034
Petitioner: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Respondent: CHANTAL BASTIAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ROBERT BELTRAMI, WILLIAM LAKER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05544
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05536
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Saphronia Jones, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90028
Plaintiff - Respondent: SAPHRONIA JONES, IRMA KATELY, ANDERSON KING, JR. and others
Defendant - Petitioner: EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Mukasangwa v. Lynch
as 15-1588
Petitioner: MARIE CHANTAL MUKASANGWA
Respondent: LORETTA LYNCH, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00550
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?