Cases 21 - 30 of 986
In re: Dwight Lampkin
as 24-10352
Petitioner:
In re: DWIGHT DION LAMPKIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
United States of America v. Burden (Kelvin Burden)
as 24-202
Defendant:
DAVID 4 BURDEN, ANTHONY BURDEN, WILLIE PREZZIE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KELVIN BURDEN, Waffle, Uncle and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D. v. Bandes, et al.
as 24-143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
E. D., individually and as a successor-in-interest to Decedent, Maria Barraza, by and through his Guardian ad Litem Patricia Barraza
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO BANDES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, TIFFANY YARNELL, DWIGHT CHILDS and others
US v. Randall Holden, II
as 24-6002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDALL DWIGHT HOLDEN, II
Lopez, et al. v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-4343
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BONNIE LOPEZ and COLLEEN LACKEY
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, DWIGHT W. NEVEN, GARY PICCININI and others
Defendant:
KARISSA CURRIER, JAZMINA FLANIGAN, BRIGIDO BAYAWA and others
USA v. Alexander
as 23-30900
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dwight Alexander
US v. Dwight Williams
as 23-4750
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DWIGHT DION WILLIAMS
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
USA v. Dwight Moss
as 23-13983
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DWIGHT ERICKSON MOSS
Enchanted Green LLC v. Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission et al
as 2:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Enchanted Green LLC
Defendant:
Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission, William Saliski, Jr., Sam Blakemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
