Cases 21 - 30 of 144
US v. Karl Moore, Sr.
as 20-6301
Defendant / Appellant:
KARL E. MOORE, SR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anthony Turner v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 19-17440
Defendant / Appellee:
W. L. MUNIZ, Warden at SVSP, SCOTT KERNAN, T. FOSS, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER
David Lewis v. Larry Norris, et al
as 19-3436
Defendant / Appellee:
Ryle, Sergeant, ADC, Tucker Unit, Gregg E. Moore, Sergeant, ADC, Tucker Unit (originally named as Moore), Simmons, Lieutenant, ADC, Tucker Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David E. Lewis
Defendant:
Does, Inmate Barrack Porters and Infirmary Staff (Nurses), Tucker Unit
Ronald Moore v. Grady Memorial Hospital Corp., et al
as 19-14335
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH J. CARNEY, M.D., FULTON-DEKALB HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d.b.a. Grady Health System, KELVIN J. HOLLOWAY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD E. MOORE
Dingle v. Baggett et al
as 5:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Brenda Englis, Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Joseph A. Bledsoe, III and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Clifford White, Jr. v. Moses Jackson, III, et al
as 19-2491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford Lee White, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. Smart, Captain, Pine Bluff Unit-ADC, Lesa Haynes, Grievance Officer, Pine Bluff Unit-ADC, Moses Jackson, III, Deputy Warden, Pine Bluff Unit-ADC and others
Moore v. Lugo
as 1:2018cv01535
Defendant:
Richard Lugo
Plaintiff:
Derrick E. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
USA v. Charles A. Williams
as 17-3558
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES A. WILLIAMS, also known as KENDEL E. MOORE, also known as WEEBO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
