Cases 21 - 30 of 1,531
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Masons Supply Company v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Masons Supply Company
Defendant:
Salmon Bay Sand & Gravel Company and fred freeman
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00692
Defendant:
David R. Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Bouchard v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Morton S Bouchard
Defendant:
David R Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Freeman Whitfield, IV
as 24-1368
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Freeman Whitfield, IV, also known as Mr. Furley, also known as Furl, also known as Farley, also known as Mr. Farley, also known as Furley Beam, also known as Furley
San Bernardino County District Attorney v. Brian Lee Freeman
as 5:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
San Bernardino County District Attorney
Defendant:
Brian Lee Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
San Bernadino County District Attorney v. Freeman
as 5:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
San Bernadino County District Attorney
Defendant:
Brian Lee Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
San Bernardino County District Attorney v. Brian Lee Freeman
as 5:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
San Bernardino County District Attorney
Defendant:
Sui Juris Brian Lee Freeman and Brian Lee Freeman
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
United States v. Freeman
as 24-5019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KYLE EDWIN FREEMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
