Cases 21 - 30 of 787
US v. Raymond Gill
as 23-6887
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Branch v. American First Finance, LLC
as 3:2023cv04311
Petitioner:
Maengra Branch, MARTHA ALCALA, JOSE ARELLANO and others
Respondent:
American First Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
USA v. Kevin Jean-Gilles
as 23-12697
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN JEAN-GILLES
FRY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA FRY, CHRISTOPHER S. GILL, BROOKE A. GILL and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55659
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GILL v. NBC NEWS et al
as 1:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
NBC NEWS, JENNIFER BUSH, STEVEN VIOREL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dale Sundby, et al v. USDC-CASD
as 23-70128
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DALE SUNDBY, DALE SUNDBY, Trustee, MARQUEE FUNDING GROUP, INC. and others
Petitioner:
DALE SUNDBY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Arnesen et al v. Raimondo et al
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
George D. Arnesen and Jeffrey Ryan Bradley
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. and William Copeland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
