Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Matthew Hylton v. U.S. Attorney General
as 19-14825
Petitioner:
MATTHEW JOHN HYLTON
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Derrick Galvin v. Steven Rosenbaum, et al
as 19-3273
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Education, Secretary, Elizabeth C. Macdonough, U.S. Senate Official, Michael R. Pence, Vice President/President of Senate and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick S. Galvin
Sullivan v. University of Kansas Hospital, et al
as 19-3213
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN BROWN, BOB PAGE, TIFFANY WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Caree Harper v. Otis Wright, II, et al
as 19-55915
Defendant / Appellee:
OTIS D. WRIGHT II, U.S. District Court Judge, individual and official capacities, DOES, 1-10, DAVID L. HARLOW, U.S.M.S., individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREE ANNETTE HARPER
Abubakar Ahmed v. Arizona State University, et al
as 19-15086
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL ROPER, named as Arizona State Police Officer, JOHN CHIPOLSKY, agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, SUZANNE SOLOMON, named as Arizona State University Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABUBAKAR HUSSEIN AHMED
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 15-25 and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 15-20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03415
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
