Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Michael Hodges v. Kiara Harris
as 20-1256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL HODGES
Defendant:
PATRICIA BATLEY, ASHLEY K. TUNNER, Judge and J. BELL, Agent DCSE
Defendant / Appellee:
KIARA HARRIS
Darrin Bell v. USA
as 19-12465
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRIN J. BELL
Abreu v. Dougherty
as 19-586
Defendant / Appellee:
Mr. Garza, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, Mr. Sanatoro, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, L. Collins, Deputy Superintendent for Security, Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Mr. Venettozzi, William Dawson, Director of Correctional Dental Services, DOCCS, Miller, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Brian Jeremiah v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 19-35050
Defendant / Appellee:
WHITLEY, Sgt. SRCI, JOHN/JANE DOE, whomever makes decisions on blocking Telmate messages, STILLS, Sgt. SRCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN A. JEREMIAH
Brown v. Lee et al
as 3:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Honorable Mark Duncan, Hon. J. Norman Brown, Coty May and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Brown
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bell v. Jeffrey "Jack" Gordon, P.A. et al
as 8:2018cv01667
Defendant:
Jack Bernstein, P.A., Jeffrey "Jack" Gordon, P.A. and Andrew D. Stone, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Brenda J. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as NYN/5:18-cv-00466
Plaintiff:
John J. Bell and Debra Bell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
