Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Hecking v. NH Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 14-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIRCK HECKING
Defendant - Appellee:
NH CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES, KELLY AYOTTE, KATHERINE J. BARGER and others
Diesch et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-13185
Plaintiff:
Katherine J. Diesch and James Diesch
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Simms v. Austin Radiological Association
as 1:2010cv00914
Defendant:
Austin Radiological Association
Plaintiff:
Katherine J. Simms, State of Texas and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-10192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv04294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bruce Fulmer v. Scott Klein, et al
as 12-10416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY KOPP, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT W. KLEIN, DONALD B. REED, STEPHEN L. ROBERTSON and others
Jan Buettgen, et al v. Katherine Harless, et al
as 11-90024
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JAN BUETTGEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, JOHN HEFFNER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similary Situated, ALAN GOLDBERG, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
KATHERINE J. HARLESS, ANDREW COTICCHIO, SAMUEL D. JONES and others
Kopp v. Klein et al
as 3:2010cv00643
Plaintiff:
Randy Kopp
Defendant:
Scott W Klein, Donald B Reed, Stephen L Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.