Cases 21 - 30 of 671
Wang v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Zhou Wang
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AAA Bonding Agency, Inc. et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
AAA Bonding Agency, Inc. and Safety National Casualty Corp.
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Loretta Lynch and Jeh Johnson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Hugo Granados-Guevaras v. Jeff Session
as 17-60021
Petitioner:
HUGO ADIEL GRANADOS-GUEVARAS
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Busso-Estopellan v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jesus Antonio Busso-Estopellan
Defendant:
United States of America, Loretta Lynch and David Harlow
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Joseph Daniel v. Jeff Session
as 17-60019
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JOSEPH DANIEL
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Josselyn Bermudez-Diaz, et al v. Jeff Session
as 17-60020
Petitioner:
JOSSELYN MARILI BERMUDEZ-DIAZ and MERARI-SARAI VIGIL-BERMUDEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gilberto Osorio Diaz v. Jeff Sessions
as 17-60018
Petitioner:
GILBERTO OSORIO DIAZ
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DANA J. BOENTE, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and JEFF SESSIONS, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ana Portillo-Velasquez, et al v. Dana Boente
as 17-60015
Petitioner:
ANA MARIBEL PORTILLO-VELASQUEZ and JOHAN ENRIQUE SANTOS-VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Roxman Martinez Gonzalez v. Dana J. Boente
as 17-60016
Petitioner:
ROXMAN ERNESTO MARTINEZ GONZALEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jesus People U.S.A. Covenant Church v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jesus People U.S.A. Covenant Church
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson , Leon Rodriguez and Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
