Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Darrell Parks v. USA, et al
as 21-5059
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Elizabeth Trosman, Thomas J. Tourish, Jr., AUSA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell James Parks
In re: Kareem Jackson
as 21-3102
Petitioner:
In re: KAREEM M. JACKSON
Respondent:
WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Jackson v. Martin
as 21-6002
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH M. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
JIMMY MARTIN
Kui Myles v. USA, et al
as 20-55910
Defendant / Appellee:
ARACELI TREVINO, DAVID MARIN, BRIAN DEMORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUI Z. MYLES
Thompson et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv00428
Plaintiff:
Rory C. Gutchak, Kenneth A Thompson, Deanna K. Leslie and others
Defendant:
Robert Gordon, Joneigh S. Khaldun, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Moler v. Christopher Mabe, et al
as 20-5077
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN O'BRIEN, Chief Administrator DSCC, L. VAUGHN, OIC SHU Officer, THOMAS BRANSCUM, Camp Secretary and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR FLEMMING MOLER
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gerald Bush v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Aut, et al
as 19-3047
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTI M. JACKSON, ROBERT LABRUM and PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD BUSH
Ross Jackson v. Glenn Cowan, et al
as 19-13181
Defendant / Appellee:
K DORSEY, GLENN COWAN and HUTCHINS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSS M. JACKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
