Cases 21 - 30 of 1,379
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Friends of Alta et al v. Utah Department of Transportation
as 2:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Friends of Alta, Craig Heimark, International Outdoor Recreation Assett Alliance and others
Defendant:
Utah Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv22767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv22779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Betschart, et al. v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-3573
Petitioner:
WALTER BETSCHART, JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA and others
Respondent:
PATRICK GARRETT, SHERIFF, Washington County Sheriff, in his official capacity and STATE OF OREGON
Dodson v. Nichols
as 23-30793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacques Dodson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
William Everett Nichols, Estate of Scott O. Brame, James B. Reichman and others
Nichols v. The Baldwin Group, LLC
as 5:2023cv05674
Plaintiff:
Terri Nichols
Defendant:
The Baldwin Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
