Cases 21 - 30 of 30
QUALCOMM V ITC
as 08-1318
Appellee:
International Trade Commission
Intervenor:
Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.
Appellant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
ACE Relocation Systems, Inc. v. Cellico Partnership, et al
as 1:2008mc00077
Petitioner:
ACE Relocation Systems, Inc. and ACE Relocation Systems, Inc.
Respondent:
John Doe, Cellco Partnership and Nokia Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Golden Brdg Technol v. Nokia Inc, et al
as 07-40954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY INC
Defendant - Appellee:
NOKIA INC, MOTOROLA INC, T-MOBILE USA INC and others
COMMONWEALTH SCIENT V BUFFALO TECH
as 07-1449
Amicus Curiae:
3Com Corporation, Accton Technology Corp. (Taiwan), Atheros Communications, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc. and Buffalo, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation
GOLDEN BRIDGE TECH V NOKIA, INC.
as 07-1215
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Golden Bridge Technology, Inc.
Golden Bridge Technology, Inc:
and
Defendant-Appellee:
Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Nokia, Inc.
QUALCOMM V NOKIA
as 06-1317
Defendant-Appellant:
Nokia Corporation and Nokia, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Qualcomm Incorporated and Snaptrack, Inc.
MOTIONLESS KEYBOARD V MICROSOFT COR
as 05-1574
Defendant-Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, NOKIA INC. and SAITEK INDUSTRIES LTD.
Movant-Appellant:
THOMAS L. GAMBARO
MOTIONLESS KEYBOARD V MICROSOFT COR
as 05-1497
Defendant-Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, NOKIA INC. and SAITEK INDUSTRIES LTD.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
MOTIONLESS KEYBOARD COMPANY
NOKIA INC:
Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Nokia, Inc. et al
as 2:2005cv00170
Not Classified By Court:
Harlan A Martin
Plaintiff:
Golden Bridge Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Nokia, Inc., Motorola Inc, T-Mobile USA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.