Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Sandguist v. Hultguist et al
as 1:2020cv00275
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Sandguist and Steven Michael Sandquist
Defendant:
Roger Hultguist, Joann Altekruse, Jack Altekruse and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Woods v. Michael et al
as 9:2020cv80651
Defendant:
Andrew Greenbaum, Hudson Real Estate Acquisition Group, LLC, AVI Greenbaum and others
Plaintiff:
Terry V. Woods
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
US v. Steven Hale
as 20-6183
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL HALE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jonathon Hampton v. USDC-SAC
as 19-73047
Not Yet Classified:
CHASE, Detective #691, COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, BRIAN BELL, Officer #822 and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Petitioner:
JONATHON ANDREW HAMPTON
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JONATHON ANDREW HAMPTON
USA v. Stefano Vitale
as 19-20784
Defendant / Appellant:
STEFANO GUIDO VITALE, also known as Steven Michael Vincent Palizzi, also known as Steven Nakayama, also known as Steve
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Green v. Matsumoto et al
as 1:2019cv06521
Defendant:
Ms. Kiyo A. Matsumoto, Mr. Steven Michael Gold and Mr. Frederick Michael Maurin
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jonathon Hampton v. State of California, et al
as 19-17240
Defendant / Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, CITY OF SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHON ANDREW HAMPTON
Steven Tielsch v. Superintendent Pittsburgh SCI, et al
as 19-3465
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT PITTSBURGH SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL TIELSCH
Fairchild v. Nelson
as 19-4141
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL FAIRCHILD
Respondent / Appellee:
SHANE NELSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
