Cases 21 - 30 of 1,914
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-785
Plaintiff:
PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Dr. CAROL MOORES, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CHUN LEE, MD and others
US v. Shannon Myers
as 24-4172
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHANNON LAYNE MYERS, a/k/a Hambone
44 Tennyson Townhomes et al v. Insignia Homes, LTD et al
as 1:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
44 TENNYSON TOWNHOMES, NEWHALL DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, RYAN BERKERY and others
Defendant:
INSIGNIA HOMES, LTD and 44 TENNYSON TOWNHOMES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Harker v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01830
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lechele Harker
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and Delta Dental of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America et al v. Atomi Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
EMPOWER ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, EMPOWER ADVISORY GROUP, LLC and Empower Retirement LLC
Defendant:
ATOMI FINANCIAL GROUP iNC d/b/a COMPOUND PLANNING, NATHAN BENGALI, WILLEM BLOEMSMA and others
PESCE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00363
Petitioner:
SHANNON PESCE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Master Saddles LLC v. Kerr et al
as 5:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Master Saddles LLC
Defendant:
Shannon Kerr and SK Equine Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
