Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 772
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff: DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee: GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Amazon.com Inc Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01495
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, State of New York, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc
Intervenor: Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. REGAN et al
as 1:2023cv02767
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2023cv18091
Plaintiff: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant: THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DIRECTOR THOMAS A. ARNONE and others
Intervenor Defendant: Belmar Against 5G Towers, Lawrence Reynolds, Rose Daganya and others
Counter Defendant: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
New Jersey Staffing Alliance, et al v. Cari Fais, et al
as 23-2419
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEW JERSEY STAFFING ALLIANCE, AMERICAN STAFFING ASSOCIATION and NEW JERSEY BUSINESS & INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee: CARI FAIS, Acting Director of the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs in the Department of Law and Public Safety, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ROBERT ASARO-ANGELO, Commissioner of Labor and Workforce Development and others
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03885
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, SHAILEN BHATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Kinder Morgan, Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 23-1181
Petitioner: Kinder Morgan, Inc.
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Intervenor: State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
State of Missouri v. Biden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae: Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
CUBBY, ESQ. v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2023cv02842
Plaintiff: DAVID R. CUBBY, ESQ.
Defendant: CITY OF PATERSON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF PASSAIC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
State of New York, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 23-5103
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of New York, State of Hawaii, State of New Jersey and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States, Louis DeJoy, in his official capacity as the Postmaster General of the United States and United States Postal Service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?