Cases 21 - 30 of 14,379
Starbucks Corporation v. NLRB
as 24-1123
Petitioner:
Starbucks Corporation
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Bouie v. Board of Parole Hearings
as 24-2941
Petitioner:
DIRK JA'ONG BOUIE, JR.
Respondent:
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Board of Education of the Mamaroneck Union Free School District v. D.B.
as 24-1239
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE MAMARONECK UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
A. N. S., individually and on behalf of A.B., a minor and D. B., individually and on behalf of A.B., a minor
Hall v. Los Angeles Board of Supervisors Executive Officers
as 24-2926
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES BOARD OF SUPERVISORS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Chamber of Commerce v. NLRB
as 24-40331
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Hotel & Lodging Association, Associated Builders and Contractors and others
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, Lauren McFerran, Marvin Kaplan and others
Gaylor et al v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Gaylor and Paul Rabinowitz
Defendant:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Kory, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2946
Plaintiff:
PIERRE KORY, M.D., LE TRINH HOANG, D.O., BRIAN TYSON, M.D. and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, REJI VARGHESE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and ERIKA CALDERON, in her official capacity as Executive Officer of the Osteopathic Medical Board of California
Vitale v. State of California Franchise Tax Board, et al.
as 24-2906
Plaintiff:
FRANCESCO VITALE
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD and DAVID A. HUBBERT, Deputy Assistant Attorney General
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE HEALTH v. UNITE HERE Local 11
as 2:2024mc00061
Petitioner:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE HEALTH
Respondent:
UNITE HERE Local 11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
