Cases 21 - 30 of 45
USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 14-7094
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Todd Heath, State of California, Attorney General's Office; California Department of Justice. ex rel. Todd Heath, State of Delaware, Department of Justice; Attorney General's Office, ex rel. Todd Heath and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Heath
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corp., doing business as AT&T Advanced Solutions, AT&T Datacomm, Inc., doing business as AT&T Datacomm and others
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company et al v. V247 Telecom LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01409
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company , BellSouth Telecommunications LLC , Pacific Bell Telephone Company and others
Defendant:
V247 Telecom LLC , Saving Call LLC and EZ Fone LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Level 3 Communications, LLC et al v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company et al
as 1:2014cv02885
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications, LLC and Broadwing Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Company , Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated , Michigan Bell Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Level 3 Communications, LLC et al v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company et al
as 4:2013cv01080
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications, LLC and Broadwing Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated, Michigan Bell Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Cable Communication Policy Act
Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al v. 88 Connection Corporation
as 3:2013cv01157
Plaintiff:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company , Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC , Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and others
Defendant:
88 Connection Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. et al v. Raza Telecom Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01621
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. , BellSouth Telecommunications Inc , Pacific Bell Telephone Company and others
Defendant:
Raza Telecom Inc and Raza Communication, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Stella Hall v. The Ohio Bell Telephone Compan
as 12-4032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STELLA HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
THE OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
The Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Comm. of Ohio, et al
as 12-3145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, dba AT&T Ohio
Defendant:
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAIRMAN ALAN R. SCHRIBER, in his official capacity, COMMISSIONER RONDA HARTMAN FERGUS, in her official capacity, COMMISSIONER VALERIE A. LEMMIE, in her official capacity and others
Halo Wireless, Incorporated v. Alenco Communications, Inc., et al
as 12-40122
Debtor:
In the Matter of: HALO WIRELESS, INCORPORATED
Appellant:
HALO WIRELESS, INCORPORATED
Appellee:
ALENCO COMMUNICATIONS INC, ALMA COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C., doing business as AT&T Alabama and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
