Cases 21 - 30 of 392
Carter v. The State of Alaska
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Legacy Foster Carter
Defendant:
The State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of South Dakota, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Interested Party:
The American Road and Transportation Builders Association and The Associated General Contractors of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U S Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of California, California Water Resources Control Board, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United Cook Inlet Drift Association, et al. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al.
as 23-3833
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED COOK INLET DRIFT ASSOCIATION, COOK INLET FISHERMEN'S FUND, WES HUMBYRD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, GINA M. RAIMONDO, in her official capacity as the United States Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3627
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
AK Industrial Hemp Association, Inc. et al v. Alaska Department of Natural Resources et al
as 3:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
AK Industrial Hemp Association, Inc., Primo Farms North LLC doing business as Primo, GD Sales LLC doing business as Hempire-Co. and others
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Natural Resources, John C. Boyle, III, Alaska Division of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of Utah v. Su
as 23-11097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant:
Members of Congress
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. REGAN et al
as 1:2023cv02767
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
