Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
USA v. Scott Thompson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-5203
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Movant - Appellant: The Williams Companies, Inc. and Williams Power Company Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Scott Thompson
In re: Natural Gas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-8004
: In re: NATURAL GAS ROYALTIES QUI TAM LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACK J. GRYNBERG, ex rel. United States
Defendant - Appellee: PACIFIC INTERSTATE OFFSHORE COMPANY, a California corporation, PACIFIC OFFSHORE PIPELINE COMPANY, a California corporation, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Defendant: ORYX ENERGY COMPANY
Cali, et al v. Williams Companies, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-5119
Plaintiff: GEORGE CHIDLAE WEISZ, WMB HGK PLAINTIFFS, LAWRENCE M COHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee: THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC., sued as: Williams Companies, Inc., separately and senior management, WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., KEITH E. BAILEY and others
Defendant: BARCLAYS CAPITAL, BNP PARIBAS, COMMERZBANK CAPITAL MARKETS CORP and others
Objector: CASCIA II and LISA COMER
Intervenor: DAVID SCHULTZ and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Movant - Appellant: WCG SUBCLASS, NORMAN H. KIRKENDOLL and ALEX MERUELO, class member
Movant: MELIS PARONYAN, DARRYL ABRAMOWITZ, HGK ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. and others
Arandell Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01019
Plaintiff: Arandell Corp., Arandell Corp., Arandell Corp. and others
Defendant: Xcel Energy Inc., Xcel Energy Inc., Northern States Power Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Heartland Regional Medical Center et al v. Oneok, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00987
Plaintiff: Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant: Oneok, Inc., Oneok Energy Marketing & Trading Company, LP, Kansas Gas Marketing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Missouri Public Service Commission v. Oneok, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00988
Plaintiff: Missouri Public Service Commission, Missouri Public Service Commission, Missouri Public Service Commission and others
Defendant: Oneok, Inc., Oneok Energy Marketing & Trading Company, LP, Kansas Gas Marketing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Heartland Regional Medical Center et al v. Oneok, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv06048
Plaintiff: Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant: Oneok, Inc., Oneok Energy Marketing and Trading Company, L.P., Kansas Gas Marketing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Newell v. Williams Energy Partners, L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv00004
Plaintiff: Ronald E. Newell
Defendant: Williams Energy Partners, L.P., The Williams Companies Inc., Weg Gp, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
In re: Natural Gas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-8099
: In re: NATURAL GAS ROYALTIES QUI TAM LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACK J. GRYNBERG, ex rel. United States
Defendant - Appellee: PACIFIC INTERSTATE OFFSHORE COMPANY, a California corporation, PACIFIC OFFSHORE PIPELINE COMPANY, a California corporation, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Defendant: ORYX ENERGY COMPANY
Little et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2005cv01397
Defendant: Eni Petroleum Company Inc, BP America Production Company, Burlington Resources Offshore Inc and others
Plaintiff: United States of America, Randy L Little and Lanis G Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?