Cases 21 - 30 of 5,447
Tudor DuPont, et al. v. Sterling Family Trust, et al.
as 24-2636
Plaintiff:
AL TUDOR DUPONT and AURELIA ANDERSON
Defendant:
STERLING FAMILY TRUST, ROCHELLE H. STERLING, individually and as sole Trustee of Sterling Family Trust, and as Manager of Beverly Hills Properties LLC, DOES, 1-20, inclusive and others
Nessel v. Dundee Hills Wine Library, LLC
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Dundee Hills Wine Library, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
City of Terrell Texas v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
City of Terrell Texas
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service and Rose Hill Special Utility District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Robert Davis v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, ALISHA BELL, Chairperson/Chairwomen of the Wayne County Board of Commissioners, TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Owner of Gaukler Pointe Communications, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
