Cases 21 - 30 of 3,188
Shanahan et al v. IXL Learning, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02724
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Shanahan, Amy Warren and Kimberly Whitman
Defendant:
IXL Learning, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
K.O. v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al
as 24-1395
Plaintiff:
K.O., An Individual
Defendant:
RED LION HOTELS CORPORATION, et al., G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC, MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Warren v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, et al.
as 24-2849
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, CRAIG BEAZER, ELLEN COOPER and others
Nancy Hooks v. City of Warren, MI, et al
as 24-1375
Plaintiff:
NANCY HOOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN, MI, POLICE OFFICER LUCAS DOE, POLICE OFFICER BRYAN MUNAFO and others
De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, et al.
as 24-2738
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DE BOTTON
Defendant:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, WARREN LANCE and others
Emiabata et al v. Warren
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Philip Emiabata and Sylvia Emiabata
Defendant:
David M. Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richard WarrenIn re: Richard Warren
as 24-11340
Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD L. WARREN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Warren v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
Kelcy L. Warren
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431 IRS: Unauthorized Disclosure of Return & Return Info
Naicom Corporation, et al v. Dish Network Corporation, et al
as 24-1416
Plaintiff:
NAICOM CORPORATION, D&V IP HOLDINGS, LLC, PAYLINK, LLC and others
Defendant:
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK L.L.C., NAGRASTAR L.L.C. and others
Warren v. Nanos, et al.
as 24-2601
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY LEE WARREN
Defendant:
CHRIS NANOS, Sheriff, LAURA CONOVER, County Attorney, SAMANTHA WALKER, CES Dut and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
